BIOMEDICAL ETHICS IN PHARMACOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION AND FRAMEWORK :-
The relationship between physicians, scientists, and the pharmaceutical industry is a mutually advantageous one that is fraught with ethical complexity. Seemingly straightforward questions, such as whether a physician ought to enroll patients in a drug trial, which drug to prescribe when any one of several may be effective,and how to stay abreast of new drugs while remaining objective, become difficult when examined closely. This chapter provides a conceptual framework for bioethical analysis,presents some cases that illustrate ethical problems,and delineates some guidelines for consideration.
Bioethics is the study of ethical issues associated with providing health care or pursuing biomedical research. Most approaches to bioethics in the United States are secular in nature and presuppose no particular religious or theological perspective.While one’s religious beliefs may play an important role in determining personal morality,the broader endeavor of bioethical analysis attempts to be devoid of any particular religious perspective.Similarly,bioethical analysis stands independent of legal analysis.Although the law is often a consideration in bioethical decision making,laws in themselves do not determine the morality of an action.Laws are supposed to reflect a societal consensus on issues and are established to set a minimum standard of behavior.
Thus, while religion and law provide guidelines for acceptable actions, religious beliefs, and knowledge of the law are frequently insufficient to guide moral action, in the realm of health care. Solving problems that arise in the scientific and clinical contexts requires knowledge of ethical principles and the methodology for applying them.
BIOMEDICAL ETHICS AND CLINICAL RESEARCH :-
For more than 50 years, scientists, physicians, bioethicists, and the media have focused on a variety of issues in research with human subjects,or clinical research.In 1948, in response to the atrocities perpetrated by Nazi experimentation, the Nuremberg Code was developed to set forth guidelines for the acceptable conduct of scientific research.In 1964 the World Medical Association adopted the Declaration of Helsinki, which specifically guides physicians in biomedical research. These documents specify basic moral guidelines ultimately founded on concerns for autonomy,beneficence,and justice.
The guidelines require the following::-
• Subjects must give voluntary consent before being enrolled in any study after being fully advised of the study’s aims, methods, benefits, risks,and discomforts.
• Proposed studies must have sufficient scientific merit to warrant their risks.
• Studies must be designed to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering.
• Potential benefits to subjects must outweigh risks to subjects.
• Researchers must ensure subjects’ privacy and confidentiality.
• Subjects must have the right to withdraw from the study at any time.
• Researchers are obligated to stop the study if continuation is likely to result in injury to subjects.
The guidelines further require that research on human subjects be conducted by qualified individuals and that most clinical research be reviewed by an independent committee, which is generally an institutional review board.
Drug Research and Development:-
Pharmacology, unlike some other basic science disciplines, has a unique status when it comes to potential conflicts of interest. The pharmaceutical industry combines a desire for discovery and development with profit-motivated marketing and sales goals. Although scientists and physicians share the desire for drug discovery and development and are motivated by the desire to contribute to scientific advancement and improved patient care, pharmaceutical companies are simultaneously under strong commercial pressures. Pharmaceutical companies are therefore willing to offer financial incentives to physician–researchers who conduct studies, recruit patients, or are helpful in product development and testing. In some cases, this financial support may compromise professional judgment in conducting,analyzing,or reporting research.